Widzimy, że odwiedzasz naszą stronę z innego kraju lub regionu niż ten, który aktualnie przeglądasz. Czy chciałbyś zmienić kraj?
PolskaScenario: You are operating a UAS beyond visual line of sight. The ground control station displays a “Link Quality Low” warning, and you have not received a telemetry update for 12 seconds. Your mission objective is to survey a flooded area. What do you do?
Situational Judgement Test, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, non-technical skills, pilot selection, human factors. 1. Introduction The proliferation of UAS (drones) across civil, commercial, and military domains has increased demand for effective operator selection and training (ICAO, 2022). While technical proficiency in flight control is measurable, critical incidents often involve failures of judgement—e.g., prioritizing a visual fix over battery state, or misinterpreting controller handoffs.
The final 25-item SIT-UAS demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.84) and inter-rater agreement for scoring (Fleiss’ κ = 0.76). SIT-UAS scores correlated significantly with instructor-rated non-technical competence (r = 0.61, p < .001) and predicted simulator mission success (OR = 3.4 per SD increase). sit uas
Development and Validation of a Situational Judgement Test (SIT-UAS) for Unmanned Aircraft System Operators: Predicting Non-Technical Skills in Remote Piloting
Correct (expert rated best): B (Immediate RTH – prioritizes safety over mission) Least effective: A (Continued flight risks loss of aircraft) Scenario: You are operating a UAS beyond visual
Traditional technical assessments for UAS pilots focus on procedural knowledge, yet most operational failures stem from poor judgement under ambiguous or time-critical conditions. Existing selection tools lack scenario-based items specific to UAS challenges (e.g., beyond visual line of sight operations, lost link procedures).
A three-phase mixed-methods approach: (1) Critical incident interviews with 20 expert UAS operators to generate realistic scenarios; (2) Expert panel (n=10) to establish correct/incorrect response keys; (3) Validation with 150 UAS trainees, comparing SIT-UAS scores against instructor ratings and simulator performance. What do you do
(Your Name), Academic Affiliation Journal: Human Factors in Aviation or International Journal of Aerospace Psychology Abstract Objective: To design and empirically validate a Situational Judgement Test (SIT) tailored for Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) operators (SIT-UAS), assessing non-technical skills such as decision-making, situational awareness, and risk management.